About Us

The Studios

William Adair

Frame Making

Samples

Conservation

Gilding

Portfolio

Contact Us

Map

Home

RE-CREATING GILBERT STUART CON'T.

Bradley Stevens copied the original paintings in the National Gallery.

     Knowledge of the frame design can sometimes help researchers identify the artist or the tastes of his or her patron. It is likely that the Maratta-style frames, which were no doubt seen by many English travelers on the Grand Tour, heavily influenced British and some American frames in the last quarter of the eighteenth century. The Empire-style frame came into fashion during Napoleon Bonaparte's reign (1804-1815) and was imitated in the U.S. well into the 1820s. It consisted of a precise and highly refined double-scooped molding with low relief plaster or composition-cast ornaments derived from neoclassical ornamentation. Anthemion, wreath, and oak leaf elements were often found in combinations on frames of this era. An alternating anthemion-and-wreath pattern is seen on the frame that surrounds the portrait of Mrs. Thomas Avery that was painted by Gilbert Stuart about 1806. The oak leaf, a neoclassical symbol for strength, is seen on a frame made four years later for Stuart's portrait of Thomas Coffin Amory. A second frame bearing a denser configuration of oak leaves was fashioned about the same date for Stuart's portrait of Sir Isaac Coffin.

 

The acanthus leaf corner ornamentation on the original frame, along with the lamb’s tongue on the sight edge and ribbon-and-flower design on the outside edge, had to be reproduced exactly.

     Because all three of these frames were likely made in Boston for the same artist and family within a short period of time, further research may elicit the reasons for the particular choices in frame design. One theory, based upon gender specific decoration, was recently noticed by examining composite mantelpieces made by Robert Wellford for the George Reed House in New Castle, Delaware. The choice of mantle decoration (in this case, the choice between the god Ares and the goddess Diana) was intended to enhance rooms planned for gender-specific activities, such as a smoking lounge for gentlemen or a gallery for ladies. The same idea also applies to frames. It is possible that a male portrait surrounded by oak leaves was an intentional reference to masculinity; while the anthemion-and-wreath design—a feminine attribute in French iconography— would have been more appropriate for a female subject. As scholars turn their attention to frame designs, there is not doubt that even more theories will come forward.

Frames on artwork of this period may not be original and were added later for various reasons. For example, the frame on Stuart's 1807 portrait of Mrs. Joseph Lewis Cunningham (Sarah Inman Linzee) was apparently added several decades after the portrait was painted. It was done in the Greek Revival style, popular from the 1840s to the 1860s and even later in the century. This artwork may have been reframed, perhaps as it changed hands with successive generations. Or the frame may have been placed around this charming young woman in the notion of improvement or modernization. What remains is a clue to the heritage, but the exact history has yet to be unraveled.

After 1810 plaster-cast or composition ornaments gradually replaced carved decoration in both Europe and America, bringing about a degeneration of the framing craft.

The National Gallery’s chief frame conservator Steven Wilcox and Glasgow University’s Sarah Parkerson made molds of the corner ornaments of the original frames.

previous 1 2 3 4 5 next


Rear-1523 22nd Street, NW, Washington, DC 20037 Tel: 202/833-2440